Testimony and exhibits at the preliminary hearing attribute incriminating statements to Robinson: a roommate's recorded account of a note and later acknowledgments, extracted text messages, and a Discord message shortly before surrender.

That the materials were presented is thoroughly documented; their authentication trail remains publicly untested, which the claim wording already carries.

That the roommate video, texts, and Discord material were presented is thoroughly documented (KRK-E015, KRK-E016); the authentication trail through custodians and providers is publicly untested, which the claim wording already concedes.

That the roommate video, texts, and Discord material were presented is thoroughly documented (KRK-E015, KRK-E016). The authentication trail through custodians and providers remains publicly untested, which the claim wording already concedes.

That the roommate video, texts, and Discord material were presented is thoroughly documented; the authentication trail through custodians and providers remains publicly untested, which the claim wording already concedes.

The public record demonstrates that prosecutors presented exhibits and testimony attributing incriminating statements to the suspect, including a roommate interview and digital messages. This establishes the presentation of the state's narrative, though the underlying digital extractions and provider records have not yet been rigorously authenticated via cross-examination at trial.

Hearing coverage documents that a recorded roommate interview, text messages, Discord communications, and the engraved ammunition were all presented as prosecution exhibits, with both sides arguing over their implications. The claim only asserts that such statements were attributed to Robinson in court, not that they are true or fully authenticated, and that is strongly supported. The main caveat is that the authentication trail—native device exports and provider records— has not yet been subjected to adversarial testing on the public record.

Day-4 hearing coverage documents presentation of the roommate interview, extracted texts, Discord messages, and related exhibits including engraved ammunition, and the charging instrument separately alleges political-expression targeting. The graded proposition is that these materials were presented and attributed, not that they are authentic or true. Strongest opposing consideration: screenshots and second-hand accounts are weaker than database-native extractions and provider records, which have not been publicly audited, and none of this has been adjudicated.

That a roommate video, Discord messages, extracted texts, and an engraved-ammunition exhibit were presented is thoroughly documented in coverage of the hearing and in the prosecution's own filings. The claim carefully grades presentation rather than truth, which is the right scope for an unadjudicated capital case. The strongest opposing consideration is that presentation is not authentication: the native extractions, provider records, and note metadata have not been publicly examined, the judge excluded one altered compilation exhibit, and the roommate's testimony that Robinson had not previously fixated on Kirk cuts against the motive narrative built from the same materials.