Erebus

September 11 · source record · webpage

Part of the conspiracy?

Richard Porter; BBC (The Editors blog) · 2007

AI-verified citationSRC-BBC-PORTER-2007
identifier / locator
Posted February 27, 2007; author then head of news, BBC World
url
https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html
verification note
Live archived BBC page fetched 2026-08-26; byline and date confirmed against a Wayback snapshot of 2007-03-03. Quotes verbatim.
reliability notes
  • A first-person institutional account of the broadcaster's own error, which is what makes it useful and also what limits it: it is the interested party explaining itself.
  • Contains no timestamps — the frequently cited on-air time for the premature report is not in this source and is not asserted anywhere in this case file.

Evidence drawn from this source

Context· weakSEP-E037

A broadcaster's account of its own premature report

what the source states
"We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening." And: "We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy)." And: "If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that."
what we infer
Included as context for a widely circulated episode, and honestly limited: this is the interested party explaining itself, and the missing tapes are its own account of its own record-keeping. Note that the on-air time usually cited alongside this episode does not appear in this source and is asserted nowhere in this case.
limitations
  • A first-person institutional account of the institution's own error, with no independent verification of the explanation offered.
  • Contains no timestamps for either the report or the collapse.
Richard Porter (2007)AI-verified citationSEP-C017