Supports· weakKRK-E027
The EPICENTER site's computational claims: energy estimate, gas-first sequencing, epicenter at the transmitter, bleeding-onset delay
- what the source states
- ">15.6 J — Minimum energy at epicenter — Computed from necklace kinetics, component velocities, and shirt deformation work." "(775, 562) — Epicenter pixel coordinates — Dense optical flow identifies the peak motion epicenter at the precise location where the RØDE Wireless PRO transmitter was clipped to the victim's shirt." "Video shows gas escaping the collar one frame before mechanical displacement." "429–461ms — Delay to bleeding onset... 30× to 110× longer than Bernoulli–Torricelli physics predicts for an exposed vascular neck wound." The site publishes "the original, unmodified source video files from six cell phone cameras, plus the complete Python analysis script."
- what we infer
- The most technically specified affirmative case for the device hypothesis, and unusually transparent about data and code — but built on cellphone video, by an unnamed analyst, with no independent replication. Weight stays weak until the blind synchronization study (KRK-R003) or an independent re-run engages it.
- limitations
- Anonymous operator; no named credentials; no peer review or independent replication known.
- Compressed consumer video with unverified clock and frame-rate characteristics is the input to every computation.