Erebus

September 11 · source record · paper

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Niels H. Harrit; Jeffrey Farrer; Steven E. Jones; Kevin R. Ryan; Frank M. Legge; Daniel Farnsworth; Gregg Roberts; James R. Gourley; Bradley R. Larsen; The Open Chemical Physics Journal · 2009

AI-verified citationSRC-HARRIT-2009
identifier / locator
Open Chem. Phys. J. 2:7–31; DOI 10.2174/1874412500902010007
url
https://benthamopenarchives.com/abstract.php?ArticleCode=TOCPJ-2-7
verification note
Abstract page fetched live 2026-08-26 with DOI; quoted findings are verbatim from the published abstract. Full text not obtained this pass.
reliability notes
  • The journal's editor-in-chief resigned over its publication, telling a Danish science news service that the article was printed without her permission and should never have appeared in that journal; she also noted the subject lay outside her expertise, so her objection was to process, not to the chemistry.
  • No independent laboratory has reproduced the paper's central finding on custody-controlled samples.
  • Samples were collected privately by correspondents of the authors, not under a documented chain of custody.

Evidence drawn from this source

Supports· weakSEP-E039

The original nanothermite paper: red/gray chips with a low-temperature exotherm

what the source states
"We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center." "The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present." "When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite." "The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic."
what we infer
The affirmative case for the claim, recorded with the same structure as the evidence against it. Its central assertion — that elemental aluminum is present — is precisely what the independent analysis at SEP-E017 failed to find, so the two findings are in direct factual conflict rather than talking past each other. Graded weak on venue and provenance grounds rather than on the chemistry, which no third laboratory has adjudicated.
limitations
  • The journal's editor-in-chief resigned over its publication, stating it was printed without her permission and should never have appeared in that journal — while also noting the subject lay outside her expertise, so her objection went to process rather than chemistry.
  • Samples were collected privately by correspondents of the authors, with no documented chain of custody from the site.
  • Never independently reproduced on custody-controlled material.
  • Verified from the published abstract; the full text was not obtained, so no methodological detail is quoted.
Niels H. Harrit (2009)AI-verified citationSEP-C014