Erebus

September 11 · source record · report

Michael Quick v. United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology — Memorandum Opinion

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia · 2011

AI-verified citationSRC-QUICK-V-NIST-2011
identifier / locator
Civil Action No. 09-02064 (CKK); opinion filed April 7, 2011; 22 pp.
url
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-dcd-1_09-cv-02064/pdf/USCOURTS-dcd-1_09-cv-02064-0.pdf
verification note
Opinion PDF downloaded from govinfo.gov 2026-08-26; the file counts, the Director's July 9, 2009 finding, the statutory basis at 15 U.S.C. § 7306(d), and the holding quoted verbatim with printed page numbers.
reliability notes
  • A court record, authoritative for what was withheld and on what legal basis; it decides the lawfulness of the withholding, not whether the underlying model is correct.
  • The opinion's own figures do not reconcile arithmetically — 25,644 released and 68,500 withheld against 91,114 described as potentially responsive — so this case quotes the three numbers as given rather than presenting a fraction.

Evidence drawn from this source

Supports· decisiveSEP-E008

The court record: 68,500 files withheld, upheld under the statute

what the source states
"On July 9, 2009, the Director of NIST issued a formal finding pursuant to the NCSTA providing that the public disclosure of certain information gathered by NIST in connection with its investigation into the collapse of the WTC 7 building 'might jeopardize public safety.'" On the counts: "Overall, NIST produced a total of 25,644 data files responsive to Quick's request and withheld a total of 68,500 data files." On the rationale: "the withheld data files contain information that could be used to predict the collapse of a building and, if made available to a person with the appropriate level of expertise, would provide instruction to individuals wanting to learn how to simulate building collapses and how to most effectively destroy large buildings."
what we infer
Establishes that the central mechanism claim cannot be independently recomputed, and that this was a deliberate decision with a stated rationale a court accepted. The rationale is coherent; it is also exactly what makes SEP-C003 unauditable, and both things are true at once.
limitations
  • The opinion's own figures do not reconcile: 25,644 released plus 68,500 withheld against 91,114 described as potentially responsive.
  • The court decided the lawfulness of the withholding, not the adequacy of the underlying model.